Catalogue

Human Rights

PDF - Freedom of expression and defamation

PDF - Freedom of expression and defamation (2016)

Tarlach McGonagle

ISBN 978-92-871-8347-7
Type of document : Book
Format : PDF
Size : 843 KB
Language : English
Number of pages : 70

Other available languages
> French

Other available formats
> Epub file > Paper book

Price : 8,00 € / $16.00

Quantity

- 1 +

Send to a friend

PDF - Freedom of expression and defamation

PDF - Freedom of expression and defamation

Freedom of expression and defamation: where do we draw the line?

Freedom of expression is a fundamental freedom, one of the cornerstones of democracy in Europe, enshrined in various key texts, including the European Convention on Human Rights. But the boundaries between freedom to criticise and damaging a person’s honour or reputation are not always very clear. By defining public insults and defamation, the law can set limits on freedom of expression, which is neither absolute nor boundless. But how far can it go?

This study examines the details of the European Court of Human Right’s case law on defamation. It explores a range of substantive and procedural issues that the Court has considered, and clarifies the concept of defamation, positioning it in relation to freedom of expression and public debate. It explains how overly protective defamation laws can have a chilling effect on freedom of expression and public debate, and discusses the proportionality of defamation laws and their application.

Recipient :

* Required fields

CAPTCHA Image

Cancel or  

Freedom of expression and defamation: where do we draw the line?

Freedom of expression is a fundamental freedom, one of the cornerstones of democracy in Europe, enshrined in various key texts, including the European Convention on Human Rights. But the boundaries between freedom to criticise and damaging a person’s honour or reputation are not always very clear. By defining public insults and defamation, the law can set limits on freedom of expression, which is neither absolute nor boundless. But how far can it go?

This study examines the details of the European Court of Human Right’s case law on defamation. It explores a range of substantive and procedural issues that the Court has considered, and clarifies the concept of defamation, positioning it in relation to freedom of expression and public debate. It explains how overly protective defamation laws can have a chilling effect on freedom of expression and public debate, and discusses the proportionality of defamation laws and their application.

Contents

Acknowledgements
Executive summary
Introduction
          Background
          Structure and scope
1. Defining and positioning defamat ion
          1.1. Freedom of expression
          1.2. Definitions, purposes, delimitations, distinctions and balancing exercises
          1.3. Public debate
          1.4. Chilling effect
          1.5. Proportionality
2. Substantive issues   
          2.1. Facts and value judgments
          2.2. Subject of the statement
          2.3. Who is liable?
          2.4. Defences
3. Procedural and remedial issues   
          3.1. Procedural safeguards
          3.2. Civil measures and remedies
          3.3. Criminal sanctions
Conclusions   
Case law   
The authors

My basket

Newsletter