Catalogue
-
- Comité des Ministres
- Assemblée parlementaire
- Congrès
- Droits de l'homme
- Droits de l'homme et démocratie
- Droit des enfants et droit de la famille
- Les institutions démocratiques en action
- Minorités
- Dossiers sur les droits de l'homme
- Charte sociale européenne
- Cahiers de la Charte Sociale
- Egalité entre femmes et hommes
- Cour européenne des droits de l'homme
- Commissaire aux droits de l'homme
- Commission européenne des droits de l'homme
- Droit
- Santé
- Société
- Environnement
- Démocratie locale et régionale
- Education
- Langues
- Jeunesse
- Culture
- Sport
- Communication
- Questions européennes
- Comité des Ministres
Newsletter
Freedom of expression and defamation (2016)
Freedom of expression and defamation: where do we draw the line?
Freedom of expression is a fundamental freedom, one of the cornerstones of democracy in Europe, enshrined in various key texts, including the European Convention on Human Rights. But the boundaries between freedom to criticise and damaging a person’s honour or reputation are not always very clear. By defining public insults and defamation, the law can set limits on freedom of expression, which is neither absolute nor boundless. But how far can it go?
This study examines the details of the European Court of Human Right’s case law on defamation. It explores a range of substantive and procedural issues that the Court has considered, and clarifies the concept of defamation, positioning it in relation to freedom of expression and public debate. It explains how overly protective defamation laws can have a chilling effect on freedom of expression and public debate, and discusses the proportionality of defamation laws and their application.
Contents
Acknowledgements
Executive summary
Introduction
Background
Structure and scope
1. Defining and positioning defamat ion
1.1. Freedom of expression
1.2. Definitions, purposes, delimitations, distinctions and balancing exercises
1.3. Public debate
1.4. Chilling effect
1.5. Proportionality
2. Substantive issues
2.1. Facts and value judgments
2.2. Subject of the statement
2.3. Who is liable?
2.4. Defences
3. Procedural and remedial issues
3.1. Procedural safeguards
3.2. Civil measures and remedies
3.3. Criminal sanctions
Conclusions
Case law
The authors
Télécharger un extrait (1000)
Thèmes similaires
Europeans and their rights - Freedom of expression (2010)
Blasphemy, insult and hatred - Finding answers in a democratic society... (2010)
Freedom of Expression - Essays in honour of Nicolas Bratza, President of... (2012)
Freedom of expression and the Internet (2014)
- Exclusivité web !
Journalism at risk (2015)
PDF - IRIS Themes – Freedom of Expression, the Media and Journalists (2023)
Mass surveillance - Who is watching the watchers? (2016)
Mass surveillance - Who is watching the watchers? (2016)
Journalism at risk (2015)
PDF - IRIS Themes – Freedom of Expression, the Media and Journalists (2023)
Europeans and their rights - Freedom of expression (2010)
Freedom of Expression - Essays in honour of Nicolas Bratza, President of... (2012)
Blasphemy, insult and hatred - Finding answers in a democratic society... (2010)
Manual on hate speech (2009)
Freedom of expression and the Internet (2014)
Attention, en vertu de nos conditions générales de vente, l'achat des PDF/epub est réservé aux particuliers.